<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Volcano Monitoring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.below-the-fold.com/2009/02/volcano-monitoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.below-the-fold.com/2009/02/volcano-monitoring/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:16:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.below-the-fold.com/2009/02/volcano-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.below-the-fold.com/index/?p=2448#comment-267</guid>
		<description>&quot; I mean, if he makes fun of volcano monitoring, and two weeks later a volcano erupts and lots of people’s lives are saved because they were evacuated due to volcano monitoring, any defender of volcano monitoring has a pretty big club against him, don’t they?&quot;

You would think. And in so much as there is about to be a volcanic eruption in Alaska and volcano monitoring has already gotten people evacuated, I tend to think it was a more reflexive bit of wingnut stupidity than some sort of calculated shot at Palin. Anyone smart enough to construct a roundabout attack like that is also smart enough to realize that it&#039;s probably going to backfire when the volcano erupts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; I mean, if he makes fun of volcano monitoring, and two weeks later a volcano erupts and lots of people’s lives are saved because they were evacuated due to volcano monitoring, any defender of volcano monitoring has a pretty big club against him, don’t they?&#8221;</p>
<p>You would think. And in so much as there is about to be a volcanic eruption in Alaska and volcano monitoring has already gotten people evacuated, I tend to think it was a more reflexive bit of wingnut stupidity than some sort of calculated shot at Palin. Anyone smart enough to construct a roundabout attack like that is also smart enough to realize that it&#8217;s probably going to backfire when the volcano erupts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smibbo</title>
		<link>http://www.below-the-fold.com/2009/02/volcano-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>smibbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.below-the-fold.com/index/?p=2448#comment-266</guid>
		<description>I think Jindal flubbed because he flubbed. Not every mistake has a good reason. Sometimes people just aren&#039;t so good at speaking off the cuff. Talking bad about volcano monitoring was stupid and I think he picked that because it sounded &quot;large&quot; (volcanoes are big, right? &quot;monitoring&quot; probably requires big expensive machinery right?) and because Jindal just doesn&#039;t know anything about it. Kinda like Dilbert&#039;s Boss &quot;I don&#039;t know what that is so it must not be important&quot;

After all, the Republicans have proven they enjoy using that logic. Why give Jindal the benefit of the doubt? He is, after all, a total party gopher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jindal flubbed because he flubbed. Not every mistake has a good reason. Sometimes people just aren&#8217;t so good at speaking off the cuff. Talking bad about volcano monitoring was stupid and I think he picked that because it sounded &#8220;large&#8221; (volcanoes are big, right? &#8220;monitoring&#8221; probably requires big expensive machinery right?) and because Jindal just doesn&#8217;t know anything about it. Kinda like Dilbert&#8217;s Boss &#8220;I don&#8217;t know what that is so it must not be important&#8221;</p>
<p>After all, the Republicans have proven they enjoy using that logic. Why give Jindal the benefit of the doubt? He is, after all, a total party gopher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Weiner</title>
		<link>http://www.below-the-fold.com/2009/02/volcano-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Weiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.below-the-fold.com/index/?p=2448#comment-265</guid>
		<description>This is interesting, Brien -- thanks for the post. This sounds like Jindal is making a pretty big bet that the volcano won&#039;t erupt. I mean, if he makes fun of volcano monitoring, and two weeks later a volcano erupts and lots of people&#039;s lives are saved because they were evacuated due to volcano monitoring, any defender of volcano monitoring has a pretty big club against him, don&#039;t they?&#039;

Or maybe not, not in the Republican primary. If the governor of Louisiana can say with a straight face that the lesson of Katrina is that the federal government needs to stay out and do nothing, he could certainly spin away a volcanic eruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting, Brien &#8212; thanks for the post. This sounds like Jindal is making a pretty big bet that the volcano won&#8217;t erupt. I mean, if he makes fun of volcano monitoring, and two weeks later a volcano erupts and lots of people&#8217;s lives are saved because they were evacuated due to volcano monitoring, any defender of volcano monitoring has a pretty big club against him, don&#8217;t they?&#8217;</p>
<p>Or maybe not, not in the Republican primary. If the governor of Louisiana can say with a straight face that the lesson of Katrina is that the federal government needs to stay out and do nothing, he could certainly spin away a volcanic eruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

