<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of the Filibuster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.below-the-fold.com/2009/02/in-defense-of-the-filibuster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.below-the-fold.com/2009/02/in-defense-of-the-filibuster/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:16:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryela</title>
		<link>http://www.below-the-fold.com/2009/02/in-defense-of-the-filibuster/comment-page-1/#comment-4155</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.below-the-fold.com/index/?p=2329#comment-4155</guid>
		<description>Well... let&#039;s see...

Why can&#039;t people just be happy with the majority?
I mean... The &quot;majority&quot; is always changing isn&#039;t it? 
I honestly think that the filibuster is a great way to stop the majority to take over. The number 60 is fine also because we all know that 60 cannot be reached so easily. So go ahead minorities.. take your time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; let&#8217;s see&#8230;</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t people just be happy with the majority?<br />
I mean&#8230; The &#8220;majority&#8221; is always changing isn&#8217;t it?<br />
I honestly think that the filibuster is a great way to stop the majority to take over. The number 60 is fine also because we all know that 60 cannot be reached so easily. So go ahead minorities.. take your time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In Defense of the Filibuster Cont&#8217;d</title>
		<link>http://www.below-the-fold.com/2009/02/in-defense-of-the-filibuster/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive &#187; In Defense of the Filibuster Cont&#8217;d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.below-the-fold.com/index/?p=2329#comment-239</guid>
		<description>[...] regards to my defense of the filibuster, Brian Beutler responds: To get even more specific, imagine for a second that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] regards to my defense of the filibuster, Brian Beutler responds: To get even more specific, imagine for a second that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EriktheRed</title>
		<link>http://www.below-the-fold.com/2009/02/in-defense-of-the-filibuster/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>EriktheRed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.below-the-fold.com/index/?p=2329#comment-238</guid>
		<description>I remember Republicans calling for an end to fillibustering judicial nominees when they controlled the Senate. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if there were also calls among them to eliminate the filibuster altogether just to &quot;stick it to the Dems&quot;. 

Why am I not suprised that Lib/Dems would start to call for end to the filibuster now that it&#039;s THEY who are in control?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember Republicans calling for an end to fillibustering judicial nominees when they controlled the Senate. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if there were also calls among them to eliminate the filibuster altogether just to &#8220;stick it to the Dems&#8221;. </p>
<p>Why am I not suprised that Lib/Dems would start to call for end to the filibuster now that it&#8217;s THEY who are in control?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

